Positive dog training
Professionals who choose to use positive training are more likely to use positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement and negative punishment. In this way we see that calling training “positive” leads to the error of thinking that everything is pleasant for the dog, just by using the term ‘positive’, although many try to sell that this is not the case. In this way we find people who want to be professionals training dogs “positively” in the ignorant belief that this means not causing anything unpleasant in the dog, with which they try to solve many problems without understanding that they are teaching the dog to live without rules or limits, which can cause unwanted behaviors Dog trainers Houston tx.
Traditional training
On the other hand, professionals who opt for “traditional” training, in addition to using positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement and negative punishment, they also use positive punishment. “Traditional” training began in the First World War, when nothing was known about conditioning or associations, and brute force was often used to dominate and subdue dogs, which is why it has such a bad reputation and many They take advantage of this to disqualify many honest professionals. However, in keeping with current times, even applying positive punishment, there is a respectful and friendly relationship with the dog, since positive punishment is applied in a coherent manner, without attempting to humiliate the animal. We must not forget the instinctive load burned into their genetic code, the same instinct they use to survive and the same one that helps them relate and adapt innately. Therefore, it is logical to relate to them in a closer way than they would with each other, taking into account the natural behavior patterns they use to communicate, and one of them is positive punishment. Another very different thing is that there are people who, in their ignorance, do not know how to use positive punishment correctly. Obviously failing to deliver a prize is not the same as failing to give a correction; the second case is obviously more serious and unpleasant.
Positive or traditional training?
There are a large number of articles from both sides that do nothing but throw stones at each other and self-destruct in their cheap demagoguery. Both aspects are respectable, as long as humility and honesty, kindness and respect prevail. What difference does it make how one or the other does it, if both manage to help dog and owner achieve their goals in a respectful way? Both must teach the owner to understand the animal, they must explain the causes and all possible solutions and, most importantly, they must make sure that this person will know Maintain and apply what you learn over time.
We must be realistic, in both cases, both in the sector of “positivist” trainers, and in the “traditional” trainers there are those who do not use the tools and techniques well nor do they understand what they are doing. And it is this, and not working differently, that causes us all to lose credibility. It is the fault of those who call themselves trainers and they are fakes who only think about money and there are these on both ‘sides’. In the case of the “positivists”, those who fill their mouths saying that they do not cause anything unpleasant in the dog, saying what people want to hear to do bad marketing of their business, are the ones who in the end complicate things for them. to those who truly know what they say and do and apply everything as it should be applied.
On the contrary, in the case of the “traditional” ones, they are those who commit bestialities and confuse using positive punishment fairly with humiliating the dog and attacking it until it submits. We are neither enemies nor the other and therefore we should not fall so low as to criticize each other without consideration or respect; The enemies are those who give us a bad name with their terrible work to the professional dog trainers who work honestly, and it is towards them that we.